Putt’s Law observes that, “Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage and those who manage what they do not understand.” Is there any way to defeat Putt, though? In my latest post at Dev.to, I tell why I think so and how it can be done!
I’m (of course) a big fan of software engineering quotes and I recently discovered that QuoteFancy is a site with decent looking desktop wallpapers of quotes from a number of software professionals including Alan Perlis, Donald Knuth, and David Parnas. Here’s some links to quotes by these and other interesting people:
Send me some other ideas for people to look up on this site with software-engineering-related quotes?
I have begun doing some writing elsewhere. Here’s my latest over at DZone:
I practice TDD. There are a lot of reasons for this. Many of my reasons didn’t even become clear to me until after I had been doing TDD for awhile. Most people will tell you the same. It seems there are untold benefits that you have to experience for yourself. Just try it and see. If you are told about the benefits up-front, you will simply never experience for yourself how dramatic of an effect TDD can have.
But there is one reason to do TDD that I find more compelling than any other, and that reason still makes sense even if you only think about it.
Many people in the software industry are bad at their job. Probably more than in other industries. Plenty of data shows the abysmal results of software projects, but you can simply ask your nearest software professional for plenty of horror stories. I have more than ten years of experience “on the inside” of the software industry and I have found bad software teams everywhere I look.
Bad managers have a disproportionately high impact on software because bad managers build bad teams, but the individuals on the teams themselves—even the good ones—are, more often than not, complicit in and even the cause of bad software. But what is most surprising is that bad teams are almost always rewarded for their incompetence. They “meet deadlines” so they are considered to have delivered “results.”